Linked by Kroc Camen on Sun 29th Nov 2009 20:02 UTC, submitted by fsmag
Permalink for comment 396995
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-05
The comparison is rather a false one.
Chrome OS is being touted by Google as a self-contained, locked-down environment for cheap and simple boxes. Every aspect of the box and of the software on it is totally controlled by The Corporation. The comparison they make is with using a television. Whether this will ever work or take off is another story.
This has little or nothing to do with full-on, configurable, modern desktop environments whether on Linux or any other platform. It is certainly nothing to do with KDE and Gnome. Besides, Google isn't after the market for desktop Linux which at only 1-2 per cent isn't exactly an attraction for a megacorp.
It is amusing to see almost every post in this thread blaming someone or something for the dire lack of popularity of desktop Linux. Why blame anyone. What the market share figures tell us is that a decade after desktop Linux started to make waves, 98 or 99 out of 100 users still do not want to run it. For whatever reason, they just don't like it. Simple as that really.