Linked by David Adams on Fri 11th Dec 2009 01:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 399016
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-23
As questionable as the value of the Patriot Act is, in the grand scheme of things it will have little effect on your privacy.
The problem is - and I think Schmidt alludes to this - is that MANY, MANY parties log electronic communications, and any one of these can be an avenue back to authorities, fraudsters, your future employers, etc.
Take online backup sites - do you think your files are safe because they're encrypted? Nope - all the major online backup providers I checked retain the right to decrypt your data (although some will require a warrant).
The real test of privacy is if companies which offer anonymous/protected services are legally allowed to operate. Is it legal to sell encryption the government can't crack? Is it legal to pipe your access.log to /dev/null? In other words: is privacy illegal?