Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Dec 2009 17:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 399163
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-16
Huh? If any thing a cross licensing deal is, perhaps, more likely in this case.
Which one of these two companies do you think would fork out cash? Apple won't do it now; they've countersued - too much self-righteous pride to do that. Nokia won't fork out a penny. They've got a far bigger grab bag of relevant patents and tons of licensing precedent.
They'll both want to walk away with their pound of flesh and the only way they can both do that is with a cross licensing deal: Apple doesn't pay up and get's to save face. Nokia walks away with the only "legitimate" license to pinch, flick, blah, blah, blah...