Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Dec 2009 00:13 UTC
Gnome In the item we ran yesterday about GNOME and the GNU Project, one aspect got snowed under a little bit. It turns out a claim made in the iTWire article about the role a blog post by Miguel De Icaza was false, and even though the claim wasn't ours, I did repeat it, and therefore, should correct it too. I also need to offer apologies for not framing the opening of the article clear enough - had I framed it better, a lot of pointless discussion and name-calling could've been avoided.
Permalink for comment 399802
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: how about...
by HappyGod on Wed 16th Dec 2009 03:38 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: how about..."
Member since:

Sigh. When I read comments like yours, I'm really sorry that I can't mod people down and comment at the same time. Because your post really needs some southward modding.

You're probably just trolling, but just on the off chance that you're serious, I would simply say: 'get a grip'. It's not like he was announcing that life had just been discovered on Mars for crying out loud.

Personally I would like my tech news in a timely manner and run the small risk that it is occassionally bollocks. It's OK as long as retractions are printed when errors are found.

So anyway, I reckon Jesus didn't exist, and he's basically a mythical solar deity.

Reply Parent Score: 5