Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Dec 2009 00:13 UTC
Gnome In the item we ran yesterday about GNOME and the GNU Project, one aspect got snowed under a little bit. It turns out a claim made in the iTWire article about the role a blog post by Miguel De Icaza was false, and even though the claim wasn't ours, I did repeat it, and therefore, should correct it too. I also need to offer apologies for not framing the opening of the article clear enough - had I framed it better, a lot of pointless discussion and name-calling could've been avoided.
Permalink for comment 399943
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: It is all okay
by strcpy on Wed 16th Dec 2009 18:02 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: It is all okay"
strcpy
Member since:
2009-05-20

Seriously. It's not like the FSF are any worse than any other software vendor.


Last time I checked, FSF was not a "software vendor".


And FFS, it's censorship when the government does it. The owners and moderators of a private forum can moderate it however they wish.


Last time I checked, FSF was not operating "private forum". But it sure was the association with GNU that provoked arguments that the Planet Gnome should be moderated and censored.


You have no inherent human right or reasonable expectation to be able to say whatever you wish on a private forum owned and operated by someone else.


Last time I checked people whose blogs are aggregated by Planet Gnome have right to express whatever opinions they wish.

Edited 2009-12-16 18:07 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2