Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Dec 2009 21:38 UTC, submitted by whorider
Permalink for comment 400021
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
It is a matter of trust, and a question of degree.
No, I mean all distribution repositories. That is to say, those repositories of packages that are maintained by some distribution or another.
Debian has these, as does Fedora, Arch, Ubuntu, Mandriva, OpenSuse, Slackware ... almost any distribution. (Some smaller distributions leach off other repositories. For example, sidux uses the Debian sid repositories).
All of these have an impeccable record.
Debian and Ubuntu repositories include about 25,000 packages. "Smaller" distributions, such as Arch, will typically have only about 5,000 packages. This is largely a matter of the manpower available to maintain the repositories in each case.
As far as trust goes ... it is most decidely in the self-interest of the distribution to maintain the highest quality of its repositories. This is what the people involved themselves use for their own systems, and the quality of the distribution's repositories is what the entire reputation of the distribution hangs on.
As for whether or not you can trust the system ... well, having an impeccable record over many years for thousands of packages speaks a lot to that topic, wouldn't you say?
Edited 2009-12-17 01:00 UTC