Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 20th Dec 2009 21:22 UTC
Permalink for comment 400516
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-20
I'd say your classification system is correct.
For the Amiga OS, I'd say WB 1.3 to 3.1 were not "hobby operating systems" because at the time of release they had millions of users and were used in many professional applications. Even though Amiga OS 4.1 is "more advanced", I'd classify it more as a hobby OS - running only on "hobby hardware" by very few users.