Linked by bcavally on Mon 21st Dec 2009 17:18 UTC
Permalink for comment 400667
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-12-05
What is good about an OS?
Is it not indeed human nature, that is good?
So what would be good, would be to have an OS, that complements our nature.
Imagine a society at peace, and the computer used for tasks that naturally falls for it.
This would be a "good" OS.
And it would probably mean the reduction of commercial activity, products made purely to make money, and the buzz that comes with that, and drives the world insane, becoming an evil circle, of people buying products, they do not need, and not finding the real products, because they are not visible in the commercial noise.
And the question that comes with that, is ofcourse, is our society already built for this, or must we accomodate society, to fit information technology.
Networks might be better off, owned by the state, with facebook like profiles, and bankaccounts accessible. Grades and jobs should be intergrated into the system, and distribution of social welfare, likewise.
By this, we are talking about moving computing into a state of optimality. Away from commercial forces, and into our own hands, serving Us.
It is ofcourse not unlikely, that a commercial market, may be based below this, in the future.
Peace be with you!