Linked by Jean-Baptiste Queru on Tue 4th Oct 2005 18:30 UTC
After having a look at a very low-end camera two weeks ago, I've stepped a bit up in the range to have a look at a 5 megapixel model, a Kodak CX7530, which can currently be bought a Geeks.com for $175. Just like I found that the CX7220 was able to produce good 4x6 prints, I was surprised to see that CX7530 is capable of very good letter-size prints.
Permalink for comment 40071
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
---
This is the 2nd Kodak camera mr Queru reviews on here. Not a review comparing it to equal cameras from Sony, Canon, Fuji, Olympus or what have you, but just a "review" where noeffort is made on how it compares to other cameras.
This of course is understandable, there this site is not a digital photography site. What I do not understand though is why Kodak is chosen for this promotion (reviews in this format, without comparison, promote the product reviewed unless the camera is found to be junk. Cameras not reviewed then do not get the same promotion and "airplay").
Kodak is that nice company that sues Sony and wants them to cease selling cameras because Sony alledgedly violates Kodak's "IP" or patents.
No one in camera land sues others because the IP of what all is used in cameras is owned by so many companies, but Kodak wants to strong arm itself into a bigger slice of the pie. Often there are articles posted here that point out this IP and patent misuse, with good grounds.
So, why is this ignored in Kodak's case?
I boycot Kodak because they have more and more become one of that firms that wants to make money out of "IP" after the photo film and photo paper business began a downward slide.