Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd Dec 2009 20:39 UTC
Permalink for comment 400888
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-10-29
Ah, and there is the question, does the n900 even fall into the classic definition of a "phone"? I think the value of an item is in what you use it for. If you need great web browsing and computing on the go and don't want to carry it around on a shoulder strap, perhaps over 300 isn't too much.
Depends on how much you value the convenience.
But I know what you're saying, I won't spend over 150 for a graphics card or 200 for a processor. . . or over 80 for a ram stick.
But would I spend 300 for a GPU/CPU fusion processor? Yes, I could imagine it. . .
But then again, I spent 350 for my keyboard and 900 for my monitor, depends on your priorities.
Perhaps selling a laptop to pay for a phone that would replace the function would help make you feel better about it.