Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th Dec 2009 14:12 UTC
KDE Since the stream of news is still pretty much dry, I figured I'd throw in something I've been meaning to talk about for a while now, but really didn't dare to: KDE4's performance. Since experiences with KDE4 seem to widely differ between people, it might be a good idea if we, together, can find a common cause among those of us having problems.
Permalink for comment 401334
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Small assessment
by inaneframe on Sun 27th Dec 2009 21:28 UTC
Member since:

I bemoan the lack of themes and I still have a bunch of GTK apps that I love to use, I still use and LOVE GNOME, but I must say that as far as themes go, qtcurve is fast becoming my favorite, it does everything that I think clearlooks set out to do years ago but better.

As far as stability and usability, I barely use ANY Plasma apps and I'm rather simple when it comes to requirements for a desktop, but KDE 4.4 BETA2 is par excellence.

4.2 was the first truly usable version, 4.3 got a lot better but I still noticed slight annoyances that drove me away but I think that 4.4 has the right mix, hard to define fully what it is but it's quick, responsive and pleasurable to the eyes. I've had a couple plasma crashes (which I'm sure are being worked on) and Chrome doesn't work quite that well yet but I see that they are REALLY getting somewhere.

I think that GNOME devs have a lot to look over with KDE4 when they get going with GNOME 3. There are a lot of lessons to learn so maybe GNOME was right all along in waiting and letting KDE take the brunt and lead car position in innovation LOL!

Reply Score: 2