Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 2nd Jan 2010 17:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 402138
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
I never understood the hoopla over Safari. It was an adequate browser that didn't have a lot of substance to it. Version 4 is a good browser and Apple showed more concern over Safari 4.0's security, which was a huge improvement.
Still, I remember Safari fanatics cheering when Safari showed up in statistics like these. I think they'll be crying in the beer now, even just for 1 month's worth of data.
I've tried Chrome/Chromium on Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux and it's an adequate browser with a lot of speed but it's unfinished. They've apparently listened to suggestions, as I can type "osnews" and the bookmark shows up first, rather than being number 46 (or somewhere like that) in the list.
I trust it as much as any beta, which is to say that Firefox still handles more important tasks. Safari was my number 2 browser, but it's now number 4 behind Firefox, Chrome, and Opera.