Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Jan 2010 20:32 UTC
Permalink for comment 402342
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 21:46 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-06-15
This is correct they are marketing something and making false claims about it.
But inside the Microsoft/Linux world of PC's how many people are actually making production released products that are built with the ICC?
That's all I want to know, while this is shady of Intel to do how big has the side effect of this deliberate bug been? I just think many people are blowing this way out of proportion. I thought this compiler was mainly used by institutions and research type outfits.