Linked by snydeq on Wed 6th Jan 2010 20:08 UTC
Google InfoWorld's Galen Gruman writes that the main potential game-changing attribute of the Nexus One - that Google is selling the device direct - does nothing to move the industry past carrier lock-in. "At first, I wanted to credit Google for making a tentative step in the direction of smartphone freedom. But that step is so tentative and ineffectual that frankly I think it's a cynical fig leaf covering the usual practices," Gruman writes. At issue is a political battle regarding walled gardens in the U.S. cellular market, a fight that will take years to result in any true consumer freedom. "The only way we'll ever get the ability to choose a smartphone and carrier independently is for the platform providers that count - Apple, Google, and RIM - to first develop only multiband 'world' smartphones and then refuse to sell their devices (or in Google's case, use its Android license to forbid the sale of devices) to carriers that block or interfere with device portability."
Permalink for comment 403459
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Actually you're missing it!
by erak on Sun 10th Jan 2010 23:01 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Actually you're missing it!"
Member since:

The US system has been more of an innovative wild west while other countries have been able to design their systems around our experiences.

Any sources on that?

AFAIK, the most widely spread standard, GSM, was developed in Europe. And 3G was first used in Japan.

Reply Parent Score: 1