Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jan 2010 00:27 UTC
Google So, I was about to go to bed when major news regarding Google and China hit my browser. Google has stated on its blog that after a number of attacks upon Google's servers, and attempted cracking of GMail accounts from Chinese human rights activists, the company is thinking of ceasing its operations in China. Google will, in any case, cease censoring search results on
Permalink for comment 403852
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Less evil?
by boblowski on Wed 13th Jan 2010 11:55 UTC in reply to "Less evil?"
Member since:

Well, they may be annoyed at being double-crossed by the Chinese gov't, having censored their search results but still getting cracked by what are likely gov't agents.

You underestimate the nationalistic (and ethnic) sentiments of the Han majority in China. Go to a cybercafe in Beijing and ask somebody there why exactly it is the average Chinese citizen dislikes their pro-democracy activists. The answer might surprise you. Government incentives are not needed, just the government's acquiescence.

But being behind Baidu in the Chinese search market might also have something to do with it -- this just may have simply been the proverbial straw.

I highly doubt it. I don't want to be too cynical, but personally I think this should be seen in light of Google's recent marketing slip-ups (regarding the privacy of their users). Their will be some small changes in China's censorship policy, Google looks good, and business will be as usual.

There is however a deeper issue here. We in the 'free and democratic world' tend to have a somewhat overly romantic image of the power of information and access to information in authoritarian countries. Even if the Chinese government would stop those 'inelegant' censoring efforts, it's far from sure that the then available information would lead to any societal changes. I would not be surprised if it would actually lead to an even harder oppression of dissenting voices, because the dissenting voices would still be minority voices and as such are only proof of the necessity of the authoritarian sentiments. Only if those authoritarian sentiments fade, does free information have a chance of changing anything.

(For another interesting point of view: )

Reply Parent Score: 5