Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Jan 2010 16:06 UTC, submitted by fireball
Permalink for comment 404737
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
The whole operating system is a different beast. Linux has much better separation between user and administrator, simply because Windows has to evolve out of a single-user environment as it tries to be as backwards compatible as possible.
Linux, on the other hand, was multi-user from the very early days on, and if need should arise, backwards compatibility can be broken (it didn't break since 2.4.0, but that just shows good foresight by the developers).
Microsoft may one day be forced to provide built-in virtual machine technology, to be able to get rid of 2 decades of cruft they now have to maintain in the operating system.
This info you put up shows me you don't have a good grasp on windows NT. I suggest you learn more on windows NT based operating systems before saying anything else on them from now on. NT grew out of a mutiple user enviroment from the get go. Now alot of windows users and programmers coming from win 9x\3.1 going to 2k\xp have grown out of a single user enviroment unaware of how NT works, ACLS, multiusers, etc.
Edited 2010-01-18 21:00 UTC