Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Permalink for comment 406574
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Turing's Poisoned Apple
by Laurence on Fri 29th Jan 2010 00:33 UTC
Laurence
Member since:
2007-03-26

Personally I think this device is pointless:

* it's slower than netbooks yet more expensive

* it can't run OS X apps yet netbooks and other tablet PCs can run Windows / Linux apps.

* it's screen size is smaller than other tablet PCs yet too big that it's still an inconvenience to carry around (unlike, for example, the iPhone)

* it's a backlit display so it's harsher on the eyes than eInk and has a significantly shorter battery life than other eBook readers (yet again still more expensive)

* it's not even any good for note taking as you can't use a pen like you can with Windows PDAs and tablet PCs. Which means you either have to use a touch screen keyboard (which is impractical for anything more than e-mails) or carry around an additional bit of hardware (ie a keyboard attachment)

So essentially, what Apple have created is an over-sized iPod Touch that is a bad tablet PC, a bad eBook reader, a bad netbook and (in my opinion) a bad PDA as well due to the impracticability the additional size brings.


Having seen the missed chance Microsoft had when they announced the HP tablet with a vanilla install of Windows 7, I was hoping Apple would demonstrate how lead the market. But instead Apple have over-thought and ended up releasing a polished turd.

It's as if they've tried to cover all bases with one device without understanding why those markets exist separately in the 1st place.

Reply Score: 6