Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Permalink for comment 406649
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: @haters
by SReilly on Fri 29th Jan 2010 14:47 UTC in reply to "@haters"
SReilly
Member since:
2006-12-28

You have a very good point there. For us techies, such a device seems almost anathema considering how fast hardware and operating systems have advanced but for the average home user, a device like this is perfect.

My girlfriend has a user account on my custom built PC and I can tell you, the PC is a screamer. The only thing she uses her account for is web browsing (including email and watching TV shows), the odd text document or spread sheet and the odd bit of either skype or IM. While watching her computer usage habits, she would never use more than about 10% of systems resources and the biggest slice of that %10 is taken up by flash.

A device like the iPad (how I hate that name!) would be exceptionally practical for her. Almost all of her data is stored on the net (I refuse to say cloud ;-) so local storage needs are kept to a minimum. She uses one application at a time and doesn't require four gigs of ram or an SLi rig as the only games she ever plays are card games like solitaire.

I do think there is a market for low powered tablets and if anybody can market the concept, surely it's Apple.

Reply Parent Score: 4