Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 406686
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 11:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-19
People have also pointed out the Cube (which I actually bought) and the apple TV appliance. It's equally true that Apple can fail completely.
In my view, this thing is a purely secondary device. Sure, it's cool, and people will want it, if for no other reason than it's coolness-factor. I can even believe it will sell in at least modest numbers. But I highly, highly doubt that it's going to "dominate the market." It very much remains to be seen if people will shell out $500 at the entry-level for a device that's purely supplementary (and that doesn't really do anything their computer and TV don't already do anyway).
I mean, hell, like Thom said, people already knew they liked portable music players and smart phones, and there where already markets for such things; it's much less clear that people have been wanting a tablet-like device, and it's highly doubtful that huge numbers of people will be willing to pay the price Apple's asking for one.
Edited 2010-01-29 18:47 UTC