Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jan 2010 16:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 406702
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
Captain Obvious is working in the Microsoft Marketing department with this release.
Upgrading a virtual monopoly provides huge results. That's not exactly a surprise. In its day, wouldn't a Commodore 64 upgrade have been huge? How about a CP/M-80 upgrade or a combined CP/M-80/86/68000 upgrade?
It's only been since WinNT and Win95 that the majority of people started thinking about computers for home and usually, those machines were so outdated by the time the next release came that they couldn't easily upgrade.
Further, Microsoft can claim the number, but shouldn't they subtract all the Vista upgrades since it took them all this time to correct their mistakes?