Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jan 2010 16:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 406718
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
Exactly. Win2000 was okay for desktops as long as you didn't play games or use exotic hardware. When XP came along as a consumer Desktop OS, it was okay for desktops as long as you didn't play games or use exotic hardware. But, manufacturers didn't have a choice with it being the only Windows OS so they made their stuff work with XP.
Its not that XP wasn't great when migrating from win98, but win2000 was also great when migrating from win98.