Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 31st Jan 2010 14:20 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Permalink for comment 407200
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
it isn't the content, it is the tool used to play the content.... VLC for instance.
Isn't that academic? If I download H264 encoded video, I'm not merely going to store it as hard disk filler. I'm going to view it.
So consuming content is inevitably going to mean using a H264 decoder.
Given that the world and his dog seems to have a patent in H264, if they really press it, it seems that unlicensed use could run into the millions in damages (especially if proven willful --> triple damages).