Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jan 2010 16:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 407400
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-07-27
Nowhere do I claim that v2.4 is current kernel.
What I am trying to say is
1) v2.4 scaled really bad.
2) It is really difficult to scale good, it takes decades.
3) It is unrealistic to believe that v2.6 scales good.
4) I provide numerous links that support claim number 3).
5) Linux scales well on a large cluster, horizontal scaling.
6) Linux scales bad on a single computer, vertical scaling.