Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Feb 2010 23:25 UTC, submitted by Chicken Blood
Apple The beauty of the internet is such that every opinion has become worthless; this goes doubly so for those with publish buttons on (relatively, we're humble) major websites. For every opinion, there's a matching counter-opinion, and that's great. Yesterday, we linked to an article by Mark Pilgrim about tinkerers and the iPad, and of course, someone was bound to disagree with that one.
Permalink for comment 407593
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Now that's Sniveling!
by _xmv on Wed 3rd Feb 2010 15:57 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Now that's Sniveling! "
_xmv
Member since:
2008-12-09


Yes, they have been around for a while. And yes, they've been a monumental failure because they've been shackled to a decades old interface paradigm that simply doesn't work for a touch based device. The iPad is different because it tosses the old stuff out the window and provides a platform for building software that is designed from the ground up for that form factor and interaction model. The difference is hugely significant.

they're ipod touch with big screens. 3 years old design.


I praise Apple's move with the iPad because it will shatter long held expectations about what computing is and possibly can be-- not for their creation of a closed ecosystem.

but that is the point and the issue. i'm pretty sure everyones happy if apple issues great products (not that i think the ipad is great in itself - but thats a different subject)

apple marketing is very efficient. everyone *knows* that despite the ipad not being exceptionally useful (again, just like other tablet pcs in fact:p ), its going to sell. most don't know why they buy it other than "it looks cool, it sounds cool and you know, must have one"

imagine, if everyone has an ipad, and an iphone, it does not matter, if some open source or just "open" solutions gather up. 99% will be apple, closed, and most people will go that way, and get used to have no such freedom.


Judging from your post, I'm sure you don't have the depth of understanding to make such statements.

what you mean here is "you disagree with me so you canno't be correct"
just try to "think different" as you fav company used to say, without thinking about winning an internet argument. or is it you, who do not have enough depth.. or here, self-confidence to try? sure takes more effort than reading pre-conceived ideas, which most are not willing to make.

and that defines my ironical "sheep" to compare with your own renaming of a section of the population. Maybe you'll get my point, now.

Reply Parent Score: 1