Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Feb 2010 15:47 UTC
Windows So, after much, much speculation and many, many rumours, Microsoft finally took the wraps off Windows Phone 7 Series, its newest mobile operating system. Hold on to your hats, because uncharacteristically for the Redmond giant, they've rebuilt everything from the ground up - this system has little to no connection to the Windows Mobile of yore. I don't say this lightly - but dear lord, Windows Phone 7 Series is full of win. Update: Hands-on video from Engadget inside. Update II: There is no sync application. It's all done over-the-air, to the internet. Only videos and music are synced via the Zune software. Update III: Since I didn't mention it clearly, here it goes: Windows Phone 7 Series is a clean break. There is no backwards compatibility at all. Update IV: Channel9 has a 22-minute in-depth demonstration of Windows Phone 7 Series.
Permalink for comment 409665
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I have the original carts.

You're reply: That doesn't matter and I doubt you only downloaded the games you have carts for.
I doubt very much you know what you're talking about.

As you'll notice from that reply, it's very easy to make assumptions based on very little information about a person.

So while you continue to make false assumptions about myself, I'll continue to assume that you talk out of your anus ;)

What does iTunes have that Android doesn't?
* Google have an app store

You're reply: AN app store is not the same as the Apple apps store. The selection isn't even close. Apple has much better support from mainstream developers. Games like DOOM and GTA Chinatown wars.

My reply: Google has Doom, but granted that it doesn't have as many 3D games as the iPhone.
But I personally don't see that as the be-all-end-all.

If I wanted to play console games, I'd buy a DS / PSP.

I had Tomb Raider on my Windows Mobile and rarely played it yet I play Sonic The Hedgehog all the time as I can just play 5 or 10 minutes at a time while waiting for the train.

I tend to see a similar trend I see a lot in Britain. Those with an iPhone tend to play the freebe / $2 games but those who want serious game play because they have more time on their hands (eg commuters); they will have a PSP or DS.

So I'm yet to be convinced that there's as profitable market for large gaming software houses as Apple seem to be promoting.

Maybe in a few years - but at the moment smart phone battery life are still far from ideal and there market is too fragmented and the differences between platforms are too great.

However, going back to your point about choice of apps - I've already addressed this myth earlier and will repeat my point again later in this post.

Saying that Google has an app store is like saying your local mini-mart has milk and eggs so it is basically the same as wal-mart.

Sorry mate, but that's a fraking stupid statement to make.

Are you trying to say is Google's app store isn't an app store?
Are you trying to argue that a centralized repository of free and pay-for applications cannot be advertised as "app store"?
Or that, because it's not made by Apple that it's automatically inferior?

Furthermore, you've completely ignored my point about Apple's strict control over it's app store. So lets make some comparisons:
* Android has tethering apps - Apple does not.
* Android has alternative browsers with different rendering engines - Apple does not.
* Android had sat nav from day one - Apple did not.
* Android had no problems with Nine Inch Nails nor any of the other countless high profile cases where Apple inexplicably rejected their apps.

Movie and TV rentals is the other one. With itunes you can rent a movie for 30 days and you don't have to stream it. It's very convenient for travel, especially plane trips.

I'm guessing you ignored my point that you can use iTunes with Android?

Apple locks you into iTunes.
Google give you the option.

Surely choice is better none?

Edited 2010-02-16 19:48 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2