Linked by lemur2 on Fri 12th Feb 2010 17:27 UTC
Permalink for comment 409699
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-19
ODF is underspecified, if it needs to deal with an implementor whose explicit goal is to have as LITTLE interoperability as possible: Microsoft.
For players who actually want to interoperate it is good enough, and becomes even better with ODF 1.2.
So the only thing for which Microsoft is useful in the ODF landscape ist detection of underspecified stuff in ODF.
I hope OpenOffice gets beyond 50% soon, as this would definitely help with Microsoft's interoperability work.
You can compete with "bad and gratis", but you can't compete with "good and gratis", if your business needs licensing fees for survival.
Inertia and lock-in will keep Microsoft Office going for a long time to come, but eventually it will go the way of WordPerfect.