Linked by Andrew Hudson on Tue 23rd Feb 2010 00:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 410487
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-20
No, not yet. Not for an alpha-quality OS. And precisely to avoid having a whole bunch of people with modern proprietary hardware lacking open specifications from whining about their hardware not working when they thought it would.
I agree. But that is still a real concern.
Two things I have said in the past about Haiku and OSNews: focus on the fundamentals and drop that extravagant advocacy.
If an OS hasn't even reached one release, it can not be "mature" or "stable". The status of "mature" is reached after years -- and decades. Keep the alpha-status bravely and keep experimenting, but do not try to go fishing to areas which clearly are not the core strengths. You don't need that much advocacy: those that want to code, find your system without it.
(And well, this is the destiny of any "alternative operating system". You get a thousand and one Linux people -- you know, those pretending to be "open-minded" -- bitching about things that do not work compared to their system that is developed by corporate overloads; probably the same people who have never contributed code but think that contributing noise is the same thing.)