Linked by Andrew Hudson on Tue 23rd Feb 2010 00:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 410548
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-15
Well, the BFS file system was 64-bit back in 1997. So in that regard BeOS was way ahead of the crowd. As far as 64-bit kernel, I think the goal is to at least get to Beta before putting resources into that. There are only so many kernel hackers on the Haiku team, so it's better to keep focused on the most important tasks.
But if you think about it, 64-bit for Haiku is not as important as 64-bit for Windows or Linux. Haiku is targeted to desktop applications, not server applications. Currently corporations are not running large server tasks like database, web serving, file serving that require lots of RAM. This could come in the future, but not just yet.
So currently it's not the highest priority.