Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Mar 2010 17:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 412002
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-06
Would putting the "secret sauce" code in a rom or firmware chip protect it from reverse engineering? Competition would have the inputs and responses from the chip but wouldn't be able to run binary analysis against the raw compiled code blob.
Also, they would have to implement the duplicate solution in a way that did not breach the original solution's copyright. Either the first company provides the most efficient solution or competition delivers a more refined solution to the customer; the natural market forces work.
In the case of things like GPU drivers; put the firmware blob on the hardware in a flash chip and provide a generic driver interface - problem solved. The secret sauce code remains closed while the driver code can be opened up resulting in benefits that a single company has yet to match.
Would these approaches not work while resulting in a healthier more innovative software market?