Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Mar 2010 16:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 413870
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
"It takes about 70 seconds to identify a 300ms difference between browsers."
No, no, no... You guys are wrong. People can tell what the speed difference between firefox and chrome is in less than a minute. It feels extraordinary faster. The human eye can hardly detect lags of 10-20ms (remember those flickering CRTs ?), but you're talking about delays that are an order of magnitude longer.
And then, they pretend to have invented multi-threaded javascript engines... Wow...
For the standard stuff, I don't see Canvas, < video > and < audio >, and so on... Hardware acceleration is great, but if you're only accelerating basic things, it's no use...
I hope that IE 9 performs really well in order to compensate this, because such bad communication is not impressing me at all.
Edited 2010-03-16 17:54 UTC