Linked by tessmonsta on Tue 16th Mar 2010 08:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 413932
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Open source systems can be viable, but they need to be rolled out in a controlled fashion. Or you will end up with the mess that is the Linux desktop (No, I can really not explain to family/friends/whatever that their sound stopped working because someone decided to rewrite the sound server.).
Your mistake here is in thinking that "open source" is one product. It isn't. "Open source" is a vast array of software covering multiple things.
You need to compare Android to say Meego and to the iPhone OS. You need to compare an OSX or Windows 7 desktop to a Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora or OpenSuse desktop ... one at a time. Mandriva does not have "5 widget toolkits, 10 selectable 'surface managers', and at least as many ways to get and install software", it has just one of each. So too does Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, Debian and OpenSuse ... each one has just one widget toolkit, one 'surface manager', and one way to get and install software.
When you have wrapped your head around that, then come back with a real comment. Until then, you are sprouting nonsense.
Edited 2010-03-17 00:38 UTC