Linked by David Adams on Fri 19th Mar 2010 21:07 UTC
Permalink for comment 414510
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-25
Thom, I agree with you that the current news format is not worth that much, but my conception was for a separate paid section with the higher-quality content David said he'd like to pay for. However, if you feel the news links have some value too, you could charge say a cent for every news post and make 30% of them available for free. My point is the whole site will never go behind a paywall, as you have to advertise your content.
However, most of the internet WILL go behind a paywall, as it's the only model that makes sense, but when it's micropayments most won't care because the amounts will be so small and the system so easy to use.