Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Mar 2010 09:48 UTC
Permalink for comment 415733
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-18
Talk about learning nothing from history.
And with that, I mean Thom, not Apple.
It wasn't the "PC business model" that beat the Mac one, but a variety of factors (Jobs absence and a series of lackluster CEOs didn't help either).
In fact, Apple is doing JUST FINE with that very "Mac business model" TODAY (and for the previous 11 years).
How is Dell doing? Where is IBM's PC department? Compaq all well?
Actually it is almost forgotten, that Jobs in the first place was the sole reason why Apple killed off the entire Apple II business segment.
They were in the position to counter IBM, and basically make the Apple III the PC of the world. Jobs however insisted that the machine must be fanless, it then overheated en masses, and the engineer who figured it out finally did not tell Stevie boy, because Stevie boy refused a raise before telling him he was just a lowly engineer.
Result, the Apple 3 died upfront and with it the entire Apple II based business line.
Jobs can learn from his mistakes, and by god he has, but his arrogance, still gets in his way too often.
I personally cannot see the iPhone making bigger inroads than it has, without opening severely, which is exactly what Jobs hates.