Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Mar 2010 09:48 UTC
Permalink for comment 416125
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
I think that's a perfectly defensible position given your definition of "evil". I would actually use the term "amoral". That is, their actions are not largely dependant upon morals. So they can appear to be "good" or "bad" depending on what happens to make business sense.
But in the sense that the Deivl's greatest trick was convincing the world he didn't exist, yes they are all evil.