Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 31st Mar 2010 14:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 416326
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Unfortunately this is a side effect of Microsoft's promise of 'backwards compatibility for ever'. What Microsoft need to do is rip out all the old backwards compatibility code that exist within Windows, enforce probably user separation and to hell to the loss of compatibility. What will be the result? you will see slower sales, you will see slower upgrades but eventually people will move to the new version - Microsoft will just have to have the patience to be willing to put up with slower sales. The problem is that I don't see it happening because Microsoft management want to make changes with zero sacrifice nor do they want to front their shareholders and explain to them the long term strategic reason they made a decision that will yield in short term sacrifices by way of lower growth or lower profits.