Linked by xiaokj on Thu 1st Apr 2010 20:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 416975
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-19
Supporting both codecs would definitely the best solution.
But, as H264 is incompatible with free software licenses like the MPL, it will have to be supported as a downloadable plug-in, available only in countries which don't allow math to be patented.
In countries which allow patents on math (like the USA), H264 plugins will need to be payed for.
On the other hand, providing support for Theora in a browser costs next to NOTHING, so I as a user want to know why so many browser makers outright refuse to include it. If a feature is there, and users actually don't use it, so what? This feature makes the browser better, why not include it?