Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Apr 2010 22:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 417704
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-01-22
I reckon they are both semantically very close; where these two approaches diverge is the specifics of "implementation". In relation, an interesting view-point (mind the pun) can also be expressed as to the logical path kernel designers/ programmers have walked towards the result of the microkernel and the bear-metal hypervisor architectures respectively (bottom-up vs. top-down).
One thing I see as inevitable is the not-so-distant-future convergence of both design approaches.
I should add that the pdf [http://qubes-os.org/files/doc/arch-spec-0.3.pdf] provided on the website is a good read, although a bit too cursory when it comes to architectural intricacies. Attack vectors are also investigated.