Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 19th Apr 2010 13:10 UTC
Permalink for comment 419903
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
But it does though because I've been using it as my desktop for at least 5 years.
Plus the "scattershot" approach isn't really true. Sure the software development falls into that category, but the desktop distros unify all this.
Thus if you install a desktop distro you get a fully functional desktop (as has been pointed out a thousand times already).
Like what, using what hardware, what distros and how long ago?
I see Windows forums polluted with exactly the same questions. After all, if you're technically inept then you'll fsck up any OS install, be it Windows, Linux or OS X.
I don't mean to sound all superior - I'm all for making life as easy for users as possible. But the sad truth is as idiot proof as you make something, bigger idiots will come along. So simply using message boards as a guide to an OS usability is flawed. (Hell, I've even lost count of the number of "I can't work out iTunes and have wiped my iPod by mistake" queries - so even Apple suffers from the above).
Neither can OS X yet you used that as your benchmark.
Furthermore, Linux is the movie industries preferred rendering OS for special effects. So clearly "backwards" OS has something to offer.
That's the first truthful thing you've posted. And yes, it is in spite of Linux's many flaws. However there is still a workable desktop so to argue otherwise is completely false.
To go back to your benchmark - OS X was born out of the fragmentation of BSD and the lark. However, just like "desktop Linux", OS X needed strong personalities if it was to succeed - which thankfully it had.
So don't think that just because the overall Linux community is fragmented, that there isn't pockets (or rather distros) that work very well.