Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Apr 2010 19:33 UTC, submitted by ozonehole
Legal Yes, even more copyright and intellectual property stuff. We have several stories on this one today, so I figured I'd throw them all together. First and foremost, ACTA has finally been dragged out of the shadows and into the light (thanks to the EU parliament), so we can take a look at what's in there. Is it really as bad as everyone thinks it is? Short answer: yes. Long answer: Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees.
Permalink for comment 420229
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Licaon_Kter
by Karitku on Thu 22nd Apr 2010 08:28 UTC in reply to "Comment by Licaon_Kter"
Member since:

Unfortunatly article is all about technical mambo jambo. Real issue is this, if someone makes video(lets call it Burt) out of small piece of video (lets call this Lester) that is made by another person and maker of Burt gets money from showing Burt is it fair use? Shouldn't maker of Lester get some part of money from Burt maker? If you look these Hitler videos clearly it might look like that there isn't any money on play, but there is actually alot. Even if the maker of Burt don't get any money the site that hosts Burt might get, is it fair for maker of Lester?

Reply Parent Score: 2