Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Apr 2010 16:55 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Permalink for comment 420497
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-27
This was the biggest draw for me in the initial OS/2 days. At the time, both OS/2 and Windows were running DOS apps, and when specially compiled apps came for Windows 3.0, OS/2 could run those apps. For it to be a true "os/2" it should also be compatible with the current level of Windows, something that won't happen since there has been no collaboration between IBM and Microsoft since the OS/2 - Windows split.