Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Apr 2010 23:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 420691
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-02-18
OpenFirmware is just too different - you'd have to add lots of support for it to the operating systems, and somehow combine it with the PC technologies (which includes ACPI) to make it work nicely. OLPC was free to tweak the platform at will, and you might be able to salvage parts of that, but it's still much work for relatively little gain.
EFI doesn't help with open source or vendor independence: There is no completely open EFI code out there. Tianocore only covers the parts of EFI that happen long after hardware is initialized, the init stuff is closed. You could say that it's merely an operating system, and that wouldn't be too far from the truth (see "EFI Shell").
There might be a project to combine Tianocore and coreboot in this year's Google Summer of Code - if that's approved (and the student succeeds), we will have the first complete open source EFI implementation later this year.