Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Apr 2010 17:11 UTC, submitted by Idefix
Permalink for comment 421131
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-05
BSD users shouldn't have to use a Linux compatibility/emulation layer to run any programs. And I'm not even a BSD user. All programs should be... you know... native to the operating system running them. Same reason I'm sure many Linux users dread having to break out (or even install) Wine to run Windows programs.
Luckily Opera does have a FreeBSD version, and Linux/BSD are similar (UNIX-like, X.Org, etc.), so I doubt they'll make any drastic changes like they are with the Linux vs. Windows vs. Mac versions, hopefully leading to a release of both at the same time. I don't think they support NetBSD or OpenBSD though, and I don't know if those actually have Linux compatibility or not... but it shouldn't matter. Native support is always better.