Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Apr 2010 16:59 UTC
Permalink for comment 421477
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-14
But, on to Flash. Steve is right in the more narrow sense. Flash is crap, especially for mobile devices. And there are much better alternatives. In this case the ball is in Adobe's court and Jobs has put it there. Adobe should really and truly get rid of Flash and embrace the new tools. Again, I am speaking in this more narrow sense and not in the wider sense that Thom did.
flash is crap, nobody disputes this.
Question: Why does apple not want flash on their devices?
Answer: because flash has a runtime apple can not control. The prohibition of this is in their developer's agreement.
Saying this doesnt look good so they spin things.
Spin1: flush is a resource hog and drains battery life and that is why we dont allow it.
Adobe made their app to produce native code making spin1 moot and spin two was hence put forward
spin2: cross platform tools are inherently inferior.
it doesnt matter who has the ball, apple has the goal post and will move it around to maintain their strong hold on their devices and will spin things all day long.
not saying your point isnt valid, just saying it is used to justify moving around the goal post.