Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 1st May 2010 22:17 UTC
UPDATE: Engadget just wrote a reply to this article. The article says that you don't need an extra license to shoot commercial video with h.264 cameras, but I wonder why the license says otherwise, and Engadget's "quotes" of user/filmmaker indemnification by MPEG-LA are anonymous...
UPDATE 2: Engadget's editor replied to me. So according to him, the quotes are not anonymous, but organization-wide on purpose. If that's the case, I guess this concludes that. And I can take them on their word from now on.
UPDATE 3: And regarding royalties (as opposed to just licensing), one more reply by Engadget's editor.
Permalink for comment 422100
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.



Member since:
2005-09-10
Marry this perspective to ACTA and you get the feeling that Western culture is trying its hardest to loose relevancy and die :-(
And it is coming to law enforcement near you, too!
The Darknets of the world are not going to fill up with perverted imagery of sexual abuse, they are going to be jammed with pets scratching their buts and grandmas falling of their chairs.