Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 1st May 2010 22:17 UTC
UPDATE: Engadget just wrote a reply to this article. The article says that you don't need an extra license to shoot commercial video with h.264 cameras, but I wonder why the license says otherwise, and Engadget's "quotes" of user/filmmaker indemnification by MPEG-LA are anonymous...
UPDATE 2: Engadget's editor replied to me. So according to him, the quotes are not anonymous, but organization-wide on purpose. If that's the case, I guess this concludes that. And I can take them on their word from now on.
UPDATE 3: And regarding royalties (as opposed to just licensing), one more reply by Engadget's editor.
Permalink for comment 422170
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.



Member since:
2005-07-07
Pentax DSLRs produce images in the DNG format which is non-proprietary and videos are shot in MJPEG. As a camera manufacturer, they've been embracing open standards far better than the other big manufacturers.
I use a K-7 for my work, which is weddings and portraits and it's in no way lacking compared to the big two's offerings.