Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 1st May 2010 18:52 UTC, submitted by kragil
Permalink for comment 422245
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-01
Of course what they don't happen to mention is that googles method for multitasking also sucks down battery like a fat pig sucks down slop.
If I as a user say "close the email program" but then the email program just sits there running checking for email every few minutes for the next few hours and my battery is then dead, there's only one thing to blame going wrong. Poor multitasking management.
Google may think software can do a better job, and maybe it can, but it certainly isn't doing a very good job yet even as of android 2.1. Perhaps instead of just simply taking memory in to account for the lifetime of a process/application they should take in to account the battery situation and allow me to set some desired battery life. If I want maximum battery life and am willing to put up with a little bit slower app startup times that should be allowed.