Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 1st May 2010 22:17 UTC
Legal We've all heard how the h.264 is rolled over on patents and royalties. Even with these facts, I kept supporting the best-performing "delivery" codec in the market, which is h.264. "Let the best win", I kept thinking. But it wasn't until very recently when I was made aware that the problem is way deeper. No, my friends. It's not just a matter of just "picking Theora" to export a video to Youtube and be clear of any litigation. MPEG-LA's trick runs way deeper! The [street-smart] people at MPEG-LA have made sure that from the moment we use a camera or camcorder to shoot an mpeg2 (e.g. HDV cams) or h.264 video (e.g. digicams, HD dSLRs, AVCHD cams), we owe them royalties, even if the final video distributed was not encoded using their codecs! Let me show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.

UPDATE: Engadget just wrote a reply to this article. The article says that you don't need an extra license to shoot commercial video with h.264 cameras, but I wonder why the license says otherwise, and Engadget's "quotes" of user/filmmaker indemnification by MPEG-LA are anonymous...

UPDATE 2: Engadget's editor replied to me. So according to him, the quotes are not anonymous, but organization-wide on purpose. If that's the case, I guess this concludes that. And I can take them on their word from now on.

UPDATE 3: And regarding royalties (as opposed to just licensing), one more reply by Engadget's editor.

Permalink for comment 422363
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

Just got VP8? They purchased VP8 last august: http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/05/google-acquires-video-compression-... They've been pushing H.264 since then.


Can't you read? Your own link says this:
jointly announced today that they have entered into a definitive agreement under which Google will acquire On2


"Will" is future tense.

This acquisition actually occurred in Feb 2010.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10455446-265.html

http://www.unbeatable.co.uk/news/Google-buys-On2-for-1065-Millons-D...

http://www.betanews.com/article/What-does-Google-gain-from-having-p...

February 22, 2010 to be exact. That was when Google finally bought On2. Just over two months ago.

Google have been using H.264, but also they have been actively seeking a replacement.

After all, Google purchased On2 two months ago, and they have been funding various Theora projects.

Edited 2010-05-03 07:00 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2