Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 1st May 2010 22:17 UTC
UPDATE: Engadget just wrote a reply to this article. The article says that you don't need an extra license to shoot commercial video with h.264 cameras, but I wonder why the license says otherwise, and Engadget's "quotes" of user/filmmaker indemnification by MPEG-LA are anonymous...
UPDATE 2: Engadget's editor replied to me. So according to him, the quotes are not anonymous, but organization-wide on purpose. If that's the case, I guess this concludes that. And I can take them on their word from now on.
UPDATE 3: And regarding royalties (as opposed to just licensing), one more reply by Engadget's editor.
Permalink for comment 422378
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.



Member since:
2007-02-17
No, they did not. Ownership of the technology transfers with ownership of the company (or the On2 shareholdings if you will), which ocurred on Feb 22nd 2010. Until that time, On2 and Google were separate companies with separate ownership.
They didn't push H.264. This is just your fantasy. All that they said, in June 2009, was that they did not believe Theora had sufficient quality-per-bit for the purposes of YouTube. At the time, this was true.
http://lwn.net/Articles/340132/
They even said "not YET suitable". In June 2009, Theora wasn't then suitable for YouTube, it was true.
They did exactly that. See above: "Google has implemented H.264 and Ogg Theora in Chrome".
I think you must have very serious comprehension issues. It was Apple who insisted on H.264, not Google.
Of course, Apple were (and still are) lying. It is certain that there are NO patent claims on Theora at this time, and it is also certain that there are royalties on H.264, making H.264 unsuitable (according to W3C policy) for use in W3C's HTML5 standard.
Furthermore, where Apple actually had the audacity to claim "lack of hardware support", Google had already sponsored this project in the Google Summer of Code in '08
http://www.bitblit.org/gsoc/g3dvl/index.shtml
(general purpose hardware accelerated video decoding to GPUs using the Gallium3D driver framework)
and Google also funded this project:
http://wss.co.uk/pinknoise/theorarm/
http://www.ditii.com/2010/04/10/google-backs-theorarm-free-optimise...
(Theora for ARM SoCs)
and of course there is this project (Google SoC '05, '06 and '07):
http://people.xiph.org/~j/bzr/theora-fpga/doc/leon3_integration/
... any of which Apple could have included in its iDevices.
PS BTW: I told you, "After all, Google purchased On2 two months ago, and they have been funding various Theora projects". Didn't you believe me or something? Or is it just your severe lack of comprehension at work again?
Edited 2010-05-03 10:03 UTC