Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 1st May 2010 22:17 UTC
Legal We've all heard how the h.264 is rolled over on patents and royalties. Even with these facts, I kept supporting the best-performing "delivery" codec in the market, which is h.264. "Let the best win", I kept thinking. But it wasn't until very recently when I was made aware that the problem is way deeper. No, my friends. It's not just a matter of just "picking Theora" to export a video to Youtube and be clear of any litigation. MPEG-LA's trick runs way deeper! The [street-smart] people at MPEG-LA have made sure that from the moment we use a camera or camcorder to shoot an mpeg2 (e.g. HDV cams) or h.264 video (e.g. digicams, HD dSLRs, AVCHD cams), we owe them royalties, even if the final video distributed was not encoded using their codecs! Let me show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.

UPDATE: Engadget just wrote a reply to this article. The article says that you don't need an extra license to shoot commercial video with h.264 cameras, but I wonder why the license says otherwise, and Engadget's "quotes" of user/filmmaker indemnification by MPEG-LA are anonymous...

UPDATE 2: Engadget's editor replied to me. So according to him, the quotes are not anonymous, but organization-wide on purpose. If that's the case, I guess this concludes that. And I can take them on their word from now on.

UPDATE 3: And regarding royalties (as opposed to just licensing), one more reply by Engadget's editor.

Permalink for comment 422482
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Eugenia ...
by FunkyELF on Mon 3rd May 2010 21:16 UTC
FunkyELF
Member since:
2006-07-26

You mention that you have the 5DmkII.
I went for the 7D as my first dSLR.

Anyway, I am curious if you are going to actually do anything different with your camera now?
Are you going to capture in motion jpeg?

You also must be wondering, if you were to make money off your videos or even get into it professionally... how would anyone know the intermediate formats your video was stored in? I guess the problem is that MPEG-LA can with over 99% certainty say if it is HD video it was at some point stored in a format infringing our patents. Without a subpoena they wouldn't be able to tell that it was.

Reply Score: 2