Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd May 2010 23:17 UTC, submitted by PLan
Permalink for comment 422564
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-30
in iPhone application distribution. Yes, it is a niche market they have created themselves but nonetheless Apple do satisfy (1) the definition of a monopoly in this market. They are now trying to solidify the monopoly by closing any remaining loop holes in their application store and use it (2) for fighting the Adobe's Flash in a market they do not control (the web).
So, yes, these practices (1&2) do fall under antitrust laws and Abobe has right to go after Apple. However, this situation would not simply happen if there was no DMCA in the first place. On one hand we have a law (DMCA) that specifically encourages creating digital monopolies, on the other hand we try to fix the damage caused by it by imposing antitrust laws.